Opioid-Free Total Intravenous Anaesthesia Improves Postoperative Quality of Recovery After Ambulatory Gynecologic Laparoscopy: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Authors

  • Sunil Kumar Kedia Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Gouri Devi Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital College, Rajbandh, West Bengal, India
  • Ritika Kedia Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gautam Medical College and Hospital, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51168/9aczze49

Keywords:

opioid-free anaesthesia, total intravenous anaesthesia, ambulatory surgery, gynecologic laparoscopy, postoperative recovery, QoR-15

Abstract

Background: 
To compare postoperative quality of recovery and perioperative outcomes between opioid-free total intravenous anaesthesia (OFTIVA) and conventional opioid-based total intravenous anaesthesia (OTIVA) in women undergoing ambulatory gynecologic laparoscopy.

Materials and Methods: 
This retrospective comparative study included 120 women who underwent elective ambulatory gynecologic laparoscopy under total intravenous anaesthesia at Gouri Devi Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital, West Bengal, India, from March 2025 to April 2026. Patients were categorized into OFTIVA (n=60) and OTIVA (n=60) groups according to the anaesthetic technique documented in hospital records. The primary outcome was the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), rescue analgesic requirement, time to ambulation, post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, haemodynamic variables, and patient satisfaction.

Results: 
The OFTIVA group had significantly higher QoR-15 scores than the OTIVA group (130.6 ± 7.8 vs 119.4 ± 9.3; p<0.001). VAS pain scores were significantly lower with OFTIVA at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours (all p<0.001). PONV occurred in 10.0% versus 31.7% of patients (p=0.003), while rescue analgesia was required in 26.7% versus 65.0% (p<0.001). OFTIVA was associated with earlier ambulation (5.9 ± 1.5 vs 7.8 ± 2.0 hours; p<0.001) and shorter PACU stay (76.5 ± 15.3 vs 98.7 ± 19.6 minutes; p<0.001). Patient satisfaction was also significantly higher with OFTIVA (p=0.002). Mean heart rate was lower with OFTIVA (73.8 ± 7.5 vs 79.4 ± 8.6 beats/min; p<0.001), while hypotension and bradycardia did not differ significantly.

Conclusion: 
OFTIVA was associated with improved postoperative recovery and comparable haemodynamic outcomes compared with OTIVA in women undergoing ambulatory gynecologic laparoscopy.

Recommendation:
OFTIVA may be considered for appropriately selected patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy. Prospective multicentre studies are recommended to confirm these findings.

Author Biographies

  • Sunil Kumar Kedia, Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Gouri Devi Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital College, Rajbandh, West Bengal, India

    is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Anaesthesiology at Gouri Devi Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Rajbandh, West Bengal, India. His areas of clinical and academic interest include

  • Ritika Kedia, Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gautam Medical College and Hospital, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.

    is an Associate Professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at Gautam Medical College and Hospital, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India. Her areas of clinical and academic interest include

References

1. White PF, Kehlet H. Improving postoperative pain management: What are the unresolved issues? Anesthesiology. 2010;112(1):220-225. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c6316e

2. Apfel CC, Korttila K, Abdalla M, Kerger H, Turan A, Vedder I, et al. A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(24):2441-2451.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa032196

3. Gan TJ. Risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(6):1884-1898.

https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ANE.0000219597.16143.4D

4. White PF. The role of non-opioid analgesic techniques in ambulatory anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2002;94(3):577-585.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-200203000-00019

5. Kehlet H, Dahl JB. The value of multimodal or balanced analgesia in postoperative pain treatment. Anesth Analg. 1993;77(5):1048-1056. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199311000-00030

6. Sinatra R. Causes and consequences of inadequate management of acute pain. Pain Med. 2010;11(12):1859-1871.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00983.x

7. Beloeil H, Garot M, Lebuffe G, et al. Balanced opioid-free anesthesia with dexmedetomidine versus balanced anesthesia with remifentanil for major surgery. JAMA Surg. 2021;156(7):e210504.

8. Bakan M, Umutoglu T, Topuz U, et al. Opioid-free total intravenous anesthesia with propofol, dexmedetomidine and lidocaine improves postoperative recovery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2015;81(4):428-435.

9. Frauenknecht J, Kirkham KR, Jacot-Guillarmod A, Albrecht E. Analgesic impact of intraoperative lidocaine infusion. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(6):e111-e123.

10. McDonnell C, Ní Mhuircheartaigh RJ, Tuite D, et al. Opioid-sparing anaesthesia: Current concepts. BJA Educ. 2020;20(8):258-264.

11. Lavand'homme P, Estebe JP. Opioid-free anesthesia: A different regard to anesthesia practice. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018;31(5):556-561.

https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000632

12. Shanthanna H, Gilron I, Rajarathinam M, et al. Benefits and safety of perioperative opioid-free anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2021;135(6):1003-1015.

https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003907

13. Fiore JF Jr, Olleik G, El-Kefraoui C, et al. Preventing opioid prescription after surgery. Can J Surg. 2019;62(6):476-485.

14. Beloeil H, Sulpice L, Perrot A, et al. Opioid-free anesthesia in adults undergoing surgery: A review. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2019;38(5):523-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accpm.2019.05.002

15. Myles PS, Myles DB, Gallagher W, et al. Minimal clinically important difference for Quality of Recovery-15 score. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116(6):825-830.

16. Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of the QoR-15 questionnaire. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(2):161-169.

17. Myles PS. Measuring quality of recovery in perioperative clinical trials. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2018;31(4):396-401. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000612

18. Kleif J, Waage J, Christensen KB, Gögenur I. Systematic review of the QoR-15. Br J Surg. 2018;105(11):1401-1410.

19. White PF. Multimodal analgesia: Its role in preventing postoperative pain. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2008;9(1):76-82.

20. Joshi GP, Kehlet H. Procedure-specific pain management strategies. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2014;28(2):191-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2014.03.005

21. Wick EC, Grant MC, Wu CL. Postoperative multimodal analgesia pain management. Anesthesiol Clin. 2017;35(2):e89-e107.

22. Pierre S, Whelan R. Nausea and vomiting after surgery. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2013;13(1):28-32.

https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mks046

23. Apfel CC, Heidrich FM, Jukar-Rao S, et al. Evidence-based analysis of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Br J Anaesth. 2012;109(5):742-753. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aes276

24. Gan TJ, Belani KG, Bergese S, et al. Fourth Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting. Anesth Analg. 2020;131(2):411-448. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004833

25. Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A review. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(3):292-298. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952

26. Kehlet H. Fast-track surgery-an update on physiological care principles to enhance recovery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011;396(5):585-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0790-y

27. Weerink MAS, Struys MMRF, Hannivoort LN, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexmedetomidine. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56(8):893-913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-017-0507-7

28. Grape S, Kirkham KR, Frauenknecht J, Albrecht E. Intraoperative analgesia with dexmedetomidine. Br J Anaesth. 2019;122(6):e111-e123.

29. Macario A, Weinger M, Truong P, Lee M. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? Anesth Analg. 1999;89(3):652-658. https://doi.org/10.1213/00000539-199909000-00022

30. Wu CL, Naqibuddin M, Fleisher LA. Measurement of patient satisfaction as an outcome of regional anesthesia and analgesia: A systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001;26(3):196-208.

https://doi.org/10.1097/00115550-200105000-00002 https://doi.org/10.1053/rapm.2001.22257

31. Beloeil H, Garot M, Lebuffe G, et al. Opioid-free anesthesia versus opioid-based anesthesia: A multicentre randomized clinical trial. Anesthesiology. 2021;134(4):541-551. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003725

32. Shanthanna H, Gilron I, Rajarathinam M, et al. Opioid-free anesthesia for postoperative recovery: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2021;135(6):1003-1015.

https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003907

33. Thiele RH, Rea KM, Turrentine FE, et al. Standardization of perioperative care and enhanced recovery pathways. Anesthesiol Clin. 2022;40(2):239-255.

34. Miller TE, Thacker JKM, White WD, et al. Reduced length of hospital stay in enhanced recovery programs. Anesth Analg. 2014;118(5):1052-1061. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000206

35. Della Corte L, Mercorio A, Morra I, Riemma G, De Franciscis P, Palumbo M, et al. Opioid-sparing and opioid-free anaesthesia strategies in minimally invasive gynaecological surgery: Current evidence and future perspectives. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2022;87(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1159/000521364

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

Issue

Section

Section of Anesthesia and Surgery Research

How to Cite

Kedia, S., & Kedia, R. (2026). Opioid-Free Total Intravenous Anaesthesia Improves Postoperative Quality of Recovery After Ambulatory Gynecologic Laparoscopy: A Retrospective Comparative Study. Student’s Journal of Health Research Africa, 7(2), 15. https://doi.org/10.51168/9aczze49

Most read articles by the same author(s)