Incidence and predictors of hypotension following spinal anaesthesia in adult surgical patients: A hospital-based prospective cohort study.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51168/gh3qng80Cuvinte cheie:
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, nasal carriage, health care workers; hospital infection, antimicrobial susceptibility, clindamycin resistanceRezumat
Background
Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus among health care workers is an important reservoir for hospital transmission, particularly when methicillin-resistant strains are present. Screening of anterior nares helps identify silent carriers and supports targeted infection-control measures.
Objectives
To estimate the prevalence of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among health care workers in a tertiary care hospital and to describe the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of MRSA isolates, including inducible clindamycin resistance.
Methods
This hospital-based prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology, S.P.V. Government Medical College, Machilipatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India, from July to September 2025. Using consecutive sampling, 230 health care workers involved in direct or indirect patient-care services were enrolled. Anterior nasal swabs were collected and processed by conventional culture methods; Staphylococcus aureus isolates were tested phenotypically for methicillin resistance, and MRSA isolates were evaluated for inducible clindamycin resistance.
Results
The 230 participants represented multiple occupational groups: laboratory technicians/assistants 71 (30.9%), staff nurses 68 (29.6%), doctors 61 (26.5%), MNO/FNO personnel 20 (8.7%), and other clinical/support staff 10 (4.3%). Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was isolated from 204 (88.7%) samples. Staphylococcus aureus was isolated from 17 participants (7.4%); five isolates were methicillin resistant, giving an MRSA carriage prevalence of 2.2% among all health care workers and 29.4% among Staphylococcus aureus carriers. One MRSA isolate showed inducible clindamycin resistance.
Conclusion
The study demonstrated a low overall MRSA nasal carriage rate among health care workers, but nearly one-third of Staphylococcus aureus carriers harboured methicillin-resistant strains. Periodic screening remains useful for strengthening hospital infection-prevention practices.
Recommendations
Hospitals should conduct periodic MRSA surveillance among high-contact staff, reinforce hand hygiene, and ensure laboratory reporting of inducible clindamycin resistance before clinical use of clindamycin.
Referințe
1. Kluytmans J, van Belkum A, Verbrugh H. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms, and associated risks. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10(3):505-520. doi:10.1128/CMR.10.3.505. PMID:9227864.
https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.10.3.505
2. Wertheim HFL, Melles DC, Vos MC, van Leeuwen W, van Belkum A, Verbrugh HA, et al. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5(12):751-762. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70295-4. PMID:16310147.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70295-4
3. von Eiff C, Becker K, Machka K, Stammer H, Peters G; Study Group. Nasal carriage as a source of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(1):11-16. doi:10.1056/NEJM200101043440102. PMID:11136954.
https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200101043440102
4. Tong SYC, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG Jr. Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(3):603-661. doi:10.1128/CMR.00134-14. PMID:26016486.https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00134-14
5. Lakhundi S, Zhang K. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: molecular characterization, evolution, and epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018;31(4):e00020-18. doi:10.1128/CMR.00020-18. PMID:30209034.
https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00020-18
6. Sakr A, Brégeon F, Mège JL, Rolain JM, Blin O. Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization: an update on mechanisms, epidemiology, risk factors, and subsequent infections. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2419. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02419. PMID:30349525.https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02419
7. Genc O, Arikan I. The relationship between hand hygiene practices and nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriage in healthcare workers. Med Lav. 2020;111(1):54-62. doi:10.23749/mdl.v111i1.8918. PMID:32096773.
https://doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v111i1.8918
8. Rongpharpi SR, Hazarika NK, Kalita H. The prevalence of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus among healthcare workers at a tertiary care hospital in Assam with special reference to MRSA. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(2):257-260. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2013/4320.2741. PMID:23543837.https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2013/4320.2741
9. Rai JR, Amatya R, Rai SK. Hand and nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and its rate of recolonization among healthcare workers of a tertiary care hospital in Nepal. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022;4(3):dlac051. doi:10.1093/jacamr/dlac051. PMID:35668910.https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlac051
10. Gebreyesus A, Gebre-Selassie S, Mihert A. Nasal and hand carriage rate of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among health care workers in Mekelle Hospital, North Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J. 2013;51(1):41-47. PMID:23930490.
11. Price JR, Cole K, Bexley A, Kostiou V, Eyre DW, Golubchik T, et al. Transmission of Staphylococcus aureus between health-care workers, the environment, and patients in an intensive care unit: a longitudinal cohort study based on whole-genome sequencing. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17(2):207-214. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30413-3. PMID:27863959.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30413-3
12. Brown DFJ, Edwards DI, Hawkey PM, Morrison D, Ridgway GL, Towner KJ, et al. Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56(6):1000-1018. doi:10.1093/jac/dki372. PMID:16293678.https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dki372
13. Fernandes CJ, Fernandes LA, Collignon P; Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance. Cefoxitin resistance as a surrogate marker for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;55(4):506-510. doi:10.1093/jac/dki052. PMID:15743899.https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dki052
14. Steward CD, Raney PM, Morrell AK, Williams PP, McDougal LK, Jevitt L, et al. Testing for induction of clindamycin resistance in erythromycin-resistant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(4):1716-1721. doi:10.1128/JCM.43.4.1716-1721.2005. PMID:15814990.https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.4.1716-1721.2005
Descărcări
Publicat
Număr
Secțiune
Licență
Copyright (c) 2026 Dr. MHV Sindhura, Dr. V. Anitha Lavanya, Dr. Meesala Aparna, Dr. A Durga Rani

TAceastă lucrare este licențiată în temeiul Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.














