Writing Ability and Critical Thinking Among Nursing Students Using AI-Assisted Learning Versus Independent Writing: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study in a Selected Nursing College of Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51168/rnga7v04Cuvinte cheie:
Artificial intelligence, Critical thinking, Cross-sectional studies, Nursing education, Nursing students, Writing abilityRezumat
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly used by nursing students for academic writing, raising questions about their effect on writing ability and critical thinking. This study aimed to compare writing ability and critical thinking between nursing students using AI-assisted learning and those practising independent writing.
Methodology: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted among 60 third-year B.Sc. Nursing students at Regency Institute of Nursing, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India, from January 2026 to March 2026. Participants were selected by systematic random sampling, classified by self-reported writing practice into an AI-assisted learning group (Group A, n = 30) and an independent writing group (Group B, n = 30). Each participant wrote a 500–700-word essay, which was scored using investigator-developed, expert-validated rubrics for writing ability and critical thinking (0–25 each). Data were analysed using frequencies, percentages, means, standard deviations and the independent samples t-test at a 0.05 level of significance.
Results: Most participants were aged 21–23 years (68.3%), female (90.0%) and daily users of AI tools (61.7%). Excellent or good writing ability was observed in 73.3% of Group A and 23.3% of Group B, and excellent or good critical thinking in 56.7% and 10.0%, respectively. Group A had significantly higher mean writing ability scores (18.00 ± 3.64 vs 13.16 ± 3.53; t = 5.20, df = 58, p < 0.001) and critical thinking scores (16.50 ± 3.90 vs 11.00 ± 3.78; t = 5.55, df = 58, p < 0.001). The null hypothesis was rejected.
Conclusion: Nursing students using AI-assisted learning demonstrated significantly better writing ability and critical thinking than those practising independent writing, particularly in clarity of language, organisation and logical flow.
Recommendation: Nursing institutions should integrate AI tools in a guided and ethical manner that supports, rather than replaces, independent reasoning. Multicentre longitudinal studies assessing originality and long-term competence are recommended.
Referințe
1. Benner P, Sutphen M, Leonard V, Day L. Educating nurses: a call for radical
transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2010.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.01.007
2. Chan ZCY. A systematic review of critical thinking in nursing education. Nurse Educ Today. 2013;33(3):236-40.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.01.007
3. Facione PA. Critical thinking: what it is and why it counts. Hermosa Beach (CA):Insight Assessment; 2015.
4. Zawacki-Richter O, Marín VI, Bond M, Gouverneur F. Systematic review of research
on artificial intelligence applications in higher education - where are the educators? Int
J Educ Technol High Educ. 2019;16(1):39.
5. Alfaro-LeFevre R. Critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and clinical judgment: a
practical approach. 6th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2017.
6. Chen L, Chen P, Lin Z. Artificial intelligence in education: a review. IEEE Access.
2020;8:75264-78.
7. Bastable SB. Nurse as educator: principles of teaching and learning for nursing practice.
5th ed. Burlington (MA): Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2019.
8. Zhai X, Chu X, Chai CS, Jong MSY, Istenic A, Spector M, et al. A review of artificial
intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity. 2021;2021:8812542.
9. Kasneci E, Sessler K, Küchemann S, Bannert M, Dementieva D, Fischer F, et al.
ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for
education. Learn Individ Differ. 2023;103:102274.
10. O'Connor S. Open artificial intelligence platforms in nursing education: tools for
academic progress or abuse? Nurse Educ Pract. 2023;66:103537.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103537
11. Sallam M. ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic
review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare (Basel).
2023;11(6):887.
Descărcări
Publicat
Număr
Secțiune
Licență
Copyright (c) 2026 Manisha Kumari, Mansi Pal, Mohini, Muskan Bano, Muskan Pal, Sneha Dixit
TAceastă lucrare este licențiată în temeiul Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
